I’m working on discovery requests to the bar. As part of that, I’m going back over the Complaint/Answer to look at areas of factual dispute that I want Jim Lee to answer questions about.
As I was doing this, I went back and saw this stuff I said in my Answer about Woodnick lying to the court.
Oddly, I’ve noticed people posting videos about the bar’s allegations against me….but as far as I can see, not a single person has raised any concerns about Woodnick lying to the court.
Why not? JFC claims to be obsessed with punishing liars…..except for Woodnick. WHY?
If you hate one liar, don’t you hate them all? If not, why not?
We haven’t seen the deposition so I’m not sure that your quotes from Woodnick are in context or not.
Fair point. But the Bar Guy HAS seen the depo, so he knows I’m telling the truth. Let’s be fair — my freaking Answer was filed with the bar judge. Do you really think I would lie to the bar judge about something that big when the Bar Guy has the depo transcript, and thus would instantly know if I lied? Seriously….if I lied to the judge, the Bar Guy would have instantly amended his complaint to add new charges. That hasn’t happened, because I’m telling the truth.
Is Woodnick facing discipline from the bar or you? From everything you’ve posted, it appears it is YOU.
Woodnick is not facing discipline YET. And as for me, sure — Jim Lee filed charges against me. Last time he did that, he lost. He’s going to lose again this time….unless the system is rigged, in which case this is all a pointless exercise.
You wish you were hot like Omar
While absolutely true, that is not very fair. As the straightest man that ever did straight, I have informed my wife that she absolutely has a hall pass with Omar Serrato (and also Liverpool player Dominik Szoboszlai). That is one handsome man. Comparing Omar to a degenerate alcoholic is like shooting fish in a barrel.
First and far most is that HATE is a very strong word that I highly encourage people to refrain from using. Secondly, based on your past use of quotes and writings, it’s hard to believe that your quotes are true and accurate. I would need to see the deposition in order to determine whether I felt Zaddy Woodnick lied – or not.
David, regarding item number 2, Woodnick’s statement was not a lie. In her deposition Laura said she took photos of her “miscarriage”. Full stop. At the time she said she took the photos she would have been 19-24 weeks pregnant based on HER timeline. It really isn’t that difficult to comprehend. Are you intentionally being obtuse? I’ve often thought you must be on the spectrum.
Regarding Laura’s deposition, the general audience of people who have followed this case can’t speak fully to that because we don’t have access to the deposition.
If you truly believe or have irrefutable evidence that Woodnick knowingly lied, why not submit a formal complaint? I get that you’re highlighting where he said he lied in the motion or affidavit above. But this is a bar investigation about you, not about Woodnick.
To be completely honest, the way that you’re arguing it sounds like my 12 year old niece argues when she definitely did do what she’s being accused of.
Over the last two years, I have REPEATEDLY told the Bar Guy about Woodnick lying, and I made it clear — my comments to the Bar Guy should be taken as a complaint against Woodnick. The Bar Guy refused to do anything, so….that’s why I haven’t made it a priority to file a separate complaint against Woodnick (I have a draft complaint sitting here, but I just can’t bring myself to file it…since I know it will be ignored). And if your 12 year old niece sounds like me when she’s arguing, she must be headed to law school. 😉
Odd that you don’t care about Laura’s repeated lies.
Well she’s currently failing all of her classes so no, I don’t think law school is in her future.
Don’t give up – I passed two bar exams on my first try, and I wasn’t a great student in college (I did well in law school, until my mom’s second husband died on their honeymoon, but that’s a story for another time).
Laura was never pregnant, you knew she was never pregnant, yet you were complicit in perpetuating this fraud upon the court. You claim to be soooo concerned about the truth. How come you didn’t care anything about the truth when you and your client were lying to the court?
Do you have enough room at your place for Laura, her parents, and their 8 horses? And that dog that likes to piss in the hallway. Will they all be moving in soon?
The dog that had trouble making it outside to potty was named Falcor (later changed to Captain). Falcor died a couple of weeks ago, you heartless piece of human garbage.
The only piece of human garbage here is you dingy baby. Perpetuating fraud on the court is a criminal action.
I am well aware of that. So why didn’t Rachel Mitchell charge me? This is the thing — the Bar Guy LIED in his Complaint. If the bar rules didn’t give him immunity, I would absolutely sue him for millions when this case is over. But unfortunately, you can’t sue a guy who has immunity…although there may be other consequences. Having said that, I REALLY ask that you stop and consider something – Rachel Mitchell raided Laura’s phone/laptop, etc., so she has access to EVERY communication between us. If there was ANY evidence to show I knowingly presented false evidence to the court, Rachell Mitchell could have charged me with (at least) aiding and abetting under ARS § 13-303. She did not charge me, and she never will….because this DID NOT HAPPEN. The fact that Jim Lee lied about this does not make it true.
So are are you taking them all in or no? You’re just going to let them be homeless?
This is just silly…STOP. They are not going to lose their home, but even if they did, they can afford to move somewhere else. They don’t need my help.
You should really take them in, they are about to be unhoused and living on the streets. Why won’t you take them in? After all they’ve done for you!?